Jack Worthington's Social & Investment Commentaries

An Implausible Obama Scenario

Posted in Uncategorized by Jack Worthington on August 12, 2015

An Implausible Obama Scenario

The US is spending trillions on national security, most of it deployed in a “zero-failure” reliability strategy to prevent even the most ridiculous, absurd, implausible risks to US national security.  In this effort, we’ve spent ourselves into national bankruptcy and shredded the Constitution…and as a side note, must ask ourselves “what have we preserved?”, because it isn’t the United States of America.  But I digress.

Folks, we’re strip searching grannies from Des Moines at the airport, and via NSA spying, alienating the citizens of our most important world allies, and taking ourselves to the brink of WWIII with our state cyberhack program, so in that vein no cow can possibly be argued sacred in the interest of national security.

—–

Is anyone, the Dept of Defense perhaps, gaming the implausible scenario that Barack Obama is playing for the other team?

—–

I don’t need to present evidence that Obama has been highly influenced by Shiite Islam through his youth, is close to the world Islamic community today, and is possibly a closet, practicing Shiite Muslim himself.  You can google that, examine the evidence yourself, and draw your own conclusions.

In the interest of analysing all potential, even implausible threats to national security, let’s assume that Obama is a practicing Shiite Muslim, as his father was…as is Valerie Jarrett, his senior, and some say only close advisor in the White House…Obama’s version of Dick Cheney.

Quoting Valerie Jarrett: “I am Iranian by birth and of my Islamic faith.  I am also an American Citizen and I seek to help change America to be a more Islamic country.  My faith guides me and I feel like it is going well in the transition of using freedom of religion in America against itself.”

Denials of this statement can be found online, but in the interest of national security let’s assume this implausible information is true.

Quoting Anita Dunn, Obama’s former communications director:  “Her [Valerie Jarrett] role since she has been at the White House is one of the broadest and most expansive roles that I think has ever existed in the West Wing”.

In Shiite Islam, what do they say about a follower’s purpose in this life, and personal obligation to Allah?  Google it.  When you stand before Allah at the end, you will be held accountable for your life, including action / inaction on the opportunities for spreading the faith that Allah placed before you.  Your place in the afterlife depends on it.

Perhaps in the mind of Obama, he will stand before Allah one day and Allah might say “I made you leader of the great satanic countries, and what did you do on my behalf”?  Is Obama making decisions / taking actions that suggest he’s playing out his faith in the White House, as leader of the Western world / leader of the “great satanic” countries, in ways that are against the national interests of its citizens, but in the interests of Allah?  In the interest of national security, let’s game this situation and assume he is…that he’s playing for the other team…Shiite Islam specifically.

Many, if not most, unbiased clear-thinking Americans believe Obama has a strong, unnerving tendency to be Islam’s apologist vs. it’s opponents whomever and wherever they are…regardless of the scenario.  Google it.

Fact:  A recently declassified document suggests, and the former head of US Defense Dept Intelligence (DIA) just confirmed, that Obama willfully created ISIS and supports radical Islamic terrorists militarily.

http://levantreport.com/2015/08/06/former-dia-chief-michael-flynn-says-rise-of-islamic-state-was-a-willful-decision-and-defends-accuracy-of-2012-memo/

http://www.rt.com/usa/312050-dia-flynn-islamic-state/

Fact:  Through his negotiated Iranian (Shiite Islam) nuke deal, Obama proposes to overturn the chessboard of the Middle East power structure, and place Shiite Islam in a dominant regional role.  The Sunni’s in Saudi Arabia, Israeli’s, et al… are livid, and promise war.  Why would we willfully organize the conditions for WWIII, the ultimate threat to US national security, if we’ve previously been willing to bankrupt the nation and shred the Constitution to increase national security?

Fact:  The religious leaders of Iran have publicly stated that their primary purpose in life, and for the Iranian nation, is to lay the groundwork for the final battle of Armageddon and the return of the Twelfth Imam…the Mahdi…the ultimate saviour of humankind who will bring Islam throughout the world.  Google it.

Fact:  Despite warnings of catastrophic consequences, Obama removed troops from Iraq and Shiite Islam has now filled the power vacuum once occupied by Saddam Hussein’s secular government.  Iran (Shiite Islam) is now in control.  Google it.

Fact:  The old, cynical, realpolitik power structure in the Middle East / North Africa, supported by the West, used secular dictators like Hussein, Gaddafi, Mubarak, and Assad to keep a lid on radical Islam, which they perceived to be an infinitely greater risk to Western national security than the dictators themselves.  Hussein was killed under GW Bush, then Obama proceeded to remove Mubarak, kill Gaddafi, and Assad is the current target.  IMO, GW Bush’s greatest failure as president was allowing a personal vendetta? against Hussein and bad advice to cloud his judgment and topple the first domino on behalf of radical Islam.  We cannot remove Assad…the void will be filled with Obama’s ISIS.  This is realpolitik, where imperfect, even cynical solutions reign supreme.

Lastly, given that we’ve bankrupted the nation, shredded the Constitution, and brought the world to the brink of WWIII under the main supporting premise of defending national security, what traditional American leader in their right mind would open the US border, allow uncontrolled entry, and actively immigrate millions of weakly-vetted / un-vetted Muslims from hotspots of radical Islam into this country?  The answer:  Only a non-traditional leader like Obama, out to fundamentally transform the US into a more Islamic country.  The biggest losers in this strategy are the same liberal / leftist base that supports Obama through hell and back.  Ironically, Obama’s Islamicized America would eliminate those segments of society quickly, if not immediately.

An Implausible Obama Scenario:

Per Germany’s Der Spiegel, “The NSA spying scandal shows that America’s pursuit of terrorists has turned into a mania.  Spying on citizens is as monstrous and unlawful as Guantanamo Bay and drone warfare…America is sick.”  http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/spiegel-commentary-on-us-internet-surveillance-a-911256.html

Since we’ve taken national security to the point of a sick national mania that threatens world peace, no cows should be sacred.  At this point, who, what media organization, could possibly push back against ANY effort to enhance national security?  Has anyone gamed, and planned for, the equally implausible scenario that Obama is playing for the other team?

It goes without saying that Obama has not proven himself to be the type of open, transparent leader we can trust to run the country in isolation, by executive fiat, un-monitored by Congress.  Given the latest shock disclosure, that he did indeed create ISIS willfully and likely has no plans to defeat his creation, it’s what we don’t know about Obama that we should be worried about.

It’s time to control the border and reign in illegal immigration asap…as a matter of national security.  This has nothing to do with racism, and anyone pushing that narrative on the gov’t side is highly suspect.

JW

NY, NY 12 Aug 2015

Advertisements